August 8, 2024

AirSage Origin-Destination Data: Insights from TETC’s Data Evaluation

Introduction

The Eastern Transportation Coalition (TETC), spanning 19 states and the District of Columbia, is dedicated to fostering connectivity and enhancing safety and efficiency across various modes of travel within the public sector. In their recent report called “Initial TDM Validation Activity: Origin-Destination Core Data”,  TETC conducted an extensive evaluation of origin-destination data from four of its approved data vendors featured on the TETC Transportation Data Marketplace, with AirSage being one of the key participants.

Data Validation Process

TETC's assessment involved two key components. The first was a completed questionnaire about the data providers’ methodology, data characteristics, data access/privacy, and data resiliency. The second was a set of sample origin-destination (O-D) data for Richmond, Virginia filtered by custom traffic analysis zones (TAZs), date range of October 2022, day type, and day part. Other filters included vehicle type, vehicle class, and trip characteristics.

Results 

Questionnaire

A summary of the questionnaires revealed various differences between the four data providers. Key distinctions included varying data sources, the representation of average versus total trips, the provision of intersection-level origin-destination data, methods for data request, and the level of disruption anticipated in the event of the unavailability of primary data sources.

  • Data Sources: AirSage, Inrix, and Streetlight derive their data products from location-based services (LBS) and connected vehicle (CV) data, while Geotab focuses solely on CV data.
  • Representation of Trips: AirSage and Geotab offer both average and total trips, Inrix provides total trips, and Streetlight presents average trips.
  • Intersection-Level O-D: AirSage, Geotab, and Streetlight affirm their capability to provide intersection-level origin-destination data, whereas Inrix does not.
  • Data Request Method: AirSage and Inrix data can be requested through consultation (see Report Exclusions section for changes), while Geotab offers web UI or API, and Streetlight exclusively offers web UI.
  • Disruption Mitigation: When questioned about the potential impact of primary source unavailability, AirSage highlighted its resilience in weathering past losses and rapid recovery capabilities. Meanwhile, Geotab expressed they would be unaffected due to a lack of reliance on external data sources, and Inrix and Streetlight asserted minimal disruption due to their utilization of multiple data sources.

Sample Data

When scrutinizing the sample data, it is evident that the four providers generated generally consistent results with minor deviations. Notably, Inrix, Streetlight, and AirSage displayed very similar figures for trip count, average trip distance, and average travel time when segmented by Day Type & Day Part and respective vendor-specific filters. Conversely, Geotab's data diverged the most, likely ascribed to its exclusive reliance on commercial fleets as the primary data source.

Furthermore, the evaluation encompassed other data comparisons, including visualizations of the County Level OD Matrices, Top O-D Pairs at County Levels, and Top Origin and Destinations at County Level. Here too, Streetlight, Inrix, and AirSage exhibited closely aligned data patterns. Geotab emerged as the outlier once more, presumably due to its lack of supplementary data sources beyond commercial fleets.

 

 

In recounting the customer experience with AirSage during the sample data acquisition process, TETC commended the streamlined nature of data procurement, stating:

“Overall, the process of acquiring data was streamlined. The upfront meeting with AirSage helped clarify issues right away, and the fact that AirSage runs queries on the user’s behalf means that the user does not have to be concerned about understanding nuanced (and potentially impactful) parameter settings.

TETC's Takeaways

At the end of the report, TETC noted key takeaways from the evaluation of the four data providers which are quoted below:

  • TDM O-D products are diverse, and each vendor reports trip patterns from different perspectives.
  • All vendors allow users to easily create custom OD queries, including support for user-defined geographic zones, customizable time periods, and other vendor-specific filters.
  • Understanding query options are critical, especially those that determine trip definition.
  • Preliminary analysis of sample data from Richmond, VA at the county-level shows intuitive OD patterns for all 4 vendors.

Report Exclusions

Since the drafting of this report, a few things have changed at AirSage:

Methodology: Data Sources and Travel Modes

The report mentioned that AirSage cannot segregate modes within LBS data, implying that it does not provide pedestrian or bike data. However, beginning in June 2024, AirSage now offers Pedestrian Activity Density data which offers insights into high density areas of non-motorized activity. These areas are identified by using location-based services (LBS) data to capture mobile devices moving less than 1.5 m/s in a given study area. Various organizations have already begun leveraging AirSage Pedestrian Activity Density for initiatives like Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) projects and the development of pedestrian and bicycle plans.

Data Access and Privacy

In the Data Request and Data Delivery Format sections, the report indicated that AirSage data request is by consultation only, and data delivery is by direct CSV download link. However, AirSage recently launched the AirSage Transportation Platform in April 2024, which allows for easy access and visualization of mobility data. Users have the option to request data from the platform as well as use it as a mode of data delivery if desired.

Resiliency

The report stated that AirSage has demonstrated resilience by its ability to recover quickly from losses in the past - specifically, the market disruption in April 2022. To illustrate this resilience, AirSage detailed the evolution of its data panel's composition, emphasizing device quality, source reliability, and panel size in a comprehensive article. This narrative is further substantiated by the release of the study "LBS Data is Not Dead (Part 2): A Study of Actual Traffic Events Using AirSage LBS Data," reaffirming the high caliber and reliability of AirSage's LBS data offerings.

Conclusion

In summary, the Eastern Transportation Coalition's (TETC) evaluation of origin-destination data from multiple providers on the TETC Transportation Data Marketplace has provided valuable insights. Through a comprehensive questionnaire and analysis of sample data for Richmond, Virginia, TETC has shed light on the unique strengths and variations among the four data providers – AirSage, Inrix, Streetlight, and Geotab. 

Nonetheless, it is worth noting some advancements at AirSage that were not captured in the report. The recent introduction of the Pedestrian Activity Density data by AirSage has proven to be a game-changer, offering insights into non-motorized activity patterns. The launch of the user-friendly AirSage Transportation Platform has provided an alternative means for data request and delivery, enhancing accessibility and ease of use for customers. Furthermore, the confirmation of AirSage's data reliability and accuracy, particularly in its Location-Based Services (LBS) data, further solidifies its position as a trusted and leading data provider in the transportation industry.

To delve deeper into AirSage's origin-destination (O-D) data offering on the TETC Transportation Data Marketplace, visit: https://airsage.com/tetc/

Interested in learning more about location Intelligence? Check out our other blog posts.

© 2024 AirSage Inc. All rights reserved.
cross